Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03671
Original file (BC 2013 03671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03671

		COUNSEL:  NO 

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO  


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The effective date of his Post-9/11 Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) election and his associated four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) begin on 16 Mar 10.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was never notified his application for Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB was rejected when he initially applied three years ago.  There is no record of any correspondence from anyone indicating a problem with his application.  When he starting looking into how to distribute his benefits, he was shocked to realize his application had been rejected.  His organization was undergoing significant change at the time, so if AFPC did send him a notification, he did not receive it.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) and is projected to retire in said grade on 1 Jul 14.  Had the applicant completed his election to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Benefits on the requested date, he would have been able to perform the requisite four-year ADSC before his projected retirement date.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children.  Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused     Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)).  Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(f)(1) adds that the transfer of such entitlement can only be done while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.  

The process of applying for TEB requires the member to enter his home e-mail address and to verify both his home and work email addresses are correct before he can proceed further.  The TEB website clearly states, “Your transfer request is not final until you digitally sign AF Form 4406 in Virtual MPF.”  It also tells the member that “Within 72 duty hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with “TEB Incident” in the subject line, stating your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature.  If you do not receive this email, call the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) at 1-800-525-0102 ASAP!”  The applicant submitted an application for the Post-9/11 GI Bill through Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) website on 1 Mar 10.  On 3 Mar 10, he was sent the initial email requesting he sign the Statement of Understanding (SOU) agreeing to his ADSC.  The applicant never signed the SOU or made an attempt to follow-up with the TFSC as directed.  Without a signed SOU, there is no way the TFSC has any idea if the applicant agreed to the 4-year ADSC required for TEB.  The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to establish that he was the victim of an error or injustice.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Nov 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.
3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03671 in Executive Session on 28 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

     Panel Chair
Member
Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 Jul 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 8 Aug 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Nov 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair
                                    












Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592

    Original file (BC 2013 04592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233

    Original file (BC 2013 05233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03064

    Original file (BC 2013 03064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the application to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 18 January 2011. The SOU was never received. The applicant was sent an email on 19 January 2011 requesting his signature on the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02830

    Original file (BC 2013 02830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 17 Jan 12, she applied to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents; however, on 30 Jan 12, her application was rejected because she did not complete and return the Statement of Understanding (SOU). In addition, when the applicant applied through MilConnect there was a “Message from your Service Component” displayed, which states “Your transfer request is not final until you...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03407

    Original file (BC 2014 03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03407 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) be approved. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01734

    Original file (BC-2012-01734.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He knew there was a four year ADSC with the transfer but was completely unaware there was a form to sign at the time of submission for approval. He was sent an email on 13 Jun 2011 requesting he sign and return the SOU. He has served 17 years of service in the United States Air Force and as an officer takes integrity very seriously.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04365

    Original file (BC 2013 04365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding (SOU) and AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve) Air National Guard (ANG). Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00790

    Original file (BC 2014 00790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Without a signed SOU, the TFSC personnel cannot determine if the member accepts the four-year active duty service commitment (ADSC). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298

    Original file (BC 2013 04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11. He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of...